Did Kamala Really Have a Chance to Beat Donald Trump?

I was one of those who thought that Kamala Harris would win because in all the previous elections since the overturning of Dobbs by the Supreme Court, the Democrats had a pretty impressive winning streak driven by women who were mad about losing their right to reproductive freedom and making their anger known at the ballot box. But in this election, neither abortion nor saving our democracy as offered by the Democrats were the primary issues. It turned out that inflation and the border as pushed by the Republicans were by far the most deciding factors.

Most observers felt that she ran an excellent campaign and crushed Trump in the debate when he was babbling on about Haitians eating the dogs and cats, a groundless claim based on a Facebook post which neither Trump nor his VP pick JD Vance ever retracted. But it didn't really make any difference to the media or voters any more than the quote from Trump's Madison Square Garden rally calling Puerto Rico an island of garbage. On the other hand, when Harris said in an interview that she couldn't think of anything she would do differently than Biden, this was viewed in itself by many as disqualifying. The double standard between the media coverage of the two candidates was appalling.

While Harris ran on an upbeat message, Trump ran a campaign of demagoguery that apparently was more effective in getting support.

Demagoguery is a manipulative approach — often associated with dictators and sleazy politicians — that appeals to the worst nature of people. Demagoguery isn't based on reason, issues, and doing the right thing; it's based on stirring up fear and hatred to control people. For example, a politician who stirs up a fear of immigrants to distract from other issues is using demagoguery. Demagoguery is one of the most negative aspects of politics, but it's also one that's all too common.

Trump is easily the most hated politician in America. But at the same time, he is the most beloved. With Trump as a cult of personality his supporters feel that he can say or do no wrong. Their devotion to him is unconditional. To his opponents, he is a pathological liar incapable of shame. But more importantly, tribalism instills loyalty that he is one of them and not the enemy Democrats as shown by some people wearing this t-shirt at Trump rallies (of course available from Amazon). So when running against him, you have a candidate with a vote floor of a solid 47% which leaves very little headroom for squeezing out a margin - especially if there are third party candidates who may each take a percent or two. His fiery and bombastic rallies are primarily aimed toward his base voters, seemingly not trying to expand to others. But this time, he did attract voters from just about every social category leading to an unexpected popular vote majority (the first for Republicans since 2004) along with the all-important decisive Electoral College victory sweeping all 7 swing states.

On the subject of popular vote totals, check these out:

Trump 2024     76.4 million    Harris  2024    73.7 million 

Trump 2020     74.2 million    Biden   2020    81.2 million

So a big mystery is how Trump got about 2 million more votes in 2024 than in 2020 while Harris actually got 7.5 million fewer votes than Biden in 2020. People were apparently dissatisfied with Harris but couldn't vote for Trump. Why this happened is anybody's guess. Did her gender or race possibly figure into this?

All of this is formidable enough. But when you couple this with the propaganda from right wing media such as Fox News and Newsmax along with disinformation widely spread on Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) that he bought awhile back, instead of blaming Democrats for mistakes, it needs to be acknowledged that with all of his built-in advantages, Trump may still have won even with a perfect campaign waged against him. At least in America, there has been no other presidential candidate like him.

It is easy to understand how the Republicans seized the issue they thought would be most effective - inflation. After all, incumbent leaders throughout the world were booted out over the issue of inflation.

Discussion about economic issues generally requires some nuance because of their complexity. But when a consumer sees the price of gas or eggs go up, there is an understandable urge to vote their leader out. Having said that, in a free market economy, does the president really have control over prices like for eggs and gas? if the answer was yes, couldn't the president simply cut the price of these and other items? Of course he can't!

And then there was the complaint that interest rates have been too high. But interest rates were raised by the Federal Reserve Board to fight an inflationary economy - and it does not answer to the president. Inflation has now been brought under control to a low of 2.4% and the Fed as it's known is now lowering interest rates. Indeed, by most measures, the US economy is the best in the world.

Having said all of this, most Americans were still sour on our economy. There are two reasons for this I believe. One is that those on the right were relentlessly and falsely telling their audiences that the economy is a disaster. A prediction that can be easily made: Once the calendar turns to Inauguration Day on January 20th, our new president will pronounce this to be the best economy in the world. He did the same thing when inheriting President Obama's strong economy back in 2007.

But in fairness, there are Americans at the bottom of the economic ladder who are struggling, many living from paycheck to paycheck on fixed incomes. Any price increases are understandably sources of concern. It is safe to say that many of these people were tired of the status quo and wanted to try their lot with Trump.

So does this mean that Trump was unbeatable? No, Joe Biden beat him in 2020 but this was a result of Trump's major mismanagement of the pandemic resulting in countless unnecessary deaths. In this election, if Biden had withdrawn earlier leading to a primary, would that candidate have done better? Maybe, but it still would have been an uphill battle.

There are of course, major areas of concern when Trump takes over. If he does mass deportation of undocumented workers as promised, major disruptions of the economy will take place - especially agriculture, restaurants, and hospitality which will have unpredictable effects on employment and pricing in those industries. Perhaps even worse, Trump is advocating tariffs on imported goods which will certainly raise prices everywhere.

Even worse, the first couple of weeks have revealed Cabinet choices that go long on loyalty but appallingly short on relevant experience. Even many on the right are quite concerned. Will the Republican Senators have the backbone to reject any of his nominees? Stay tuned.

The midterm elections are only a couple of years away. If he really does most of the things he is threatening to do, he and his party will get a stern rebuke from the voters. It is one thing to be entertained by his rhetoric, but when many of his supporters finally suffer the consequences of his actions, I think the love affair will come to an end!

Should Joe Stay or Go?

I remember even at the start of the debate, I was getting some bad feelings. President Biden was walking slower than usual to his podium. And then I noticed his voice was so hoarse and faint. Trump did his usual practice of bombarding us with a torrent of bald face lies. Biden couldn't keep up with it all. I was yelling, no screaming at the TV screen, saying "Don't let him get away with that!" He tried but just couldn't put up any resistance. Biden was making truthful arguments in his faint voice but Trump was delivering one lie after another in a powerful, commanding voice. In a battle comparing substance, Biden won with his truthfulness. But Trump delivered his lies forcefully and effectively so it was no surprise that Trump was easily declared the winner of the debate. So much for the value of substance when it comes to debates.

Clearly, Biden was off his game but the format of the debate (agreed to by both sides so not an excuse) gave Trump a tremendous advantage while Biden's handlers thought the present rules would give Biden an advantage. In previous debates, Trump gained an advantage by constantly talking over his opponent. With the microphones being shut off while his opponent is speaking, this was thought to be assured of giving Biden an advantage.

But Trump masterfully used a known debating technique called the Gish gallop. Here is what Wikipedia has to say about it:

The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm an opponent by abandoning formal debating principles, providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments and that are impossible to address adequately in the time alloted to the opponent. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality.

During a Gish gallop, in a short space of time the galloper confronts an opponent with a rapid series of specious arguments, half-truths, misrepresentations, and outright lies that makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of the debate. Each point raised by the Gish galloper takes considerably more time to refute or to fact-check than the amount of time taken to state each one in the series. 

The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.

The agreement to no independent real time fact-checking by the moderators was in my opinion, a fatal mistake for Biden's side. For example in the debate, Trump suggested that Democrats supported abortion even days after a baby is born which is an outrageous lie repeated endlessly by Republicans but it got no reaction. When the moderators asked Trump about child care or climate change, Trump just resorted to his stream of irrelevant lies which the moderators could do little about. To CNN's credit, they did present Daniel Dale to do a fact check presentation after the debate. But how many of the people who watched the debate saw it?

The point here is that it was Biden's task under the accepted rules to do his own fact-checking. And although Biden was clearly off his game, even a younger and experienced debater would have had a difficult time countering the endless stream of lies that Trump was using to dominate the debate.

The crucial question that needs to be answered is - What truly caused Biden's malfunction during the debate? We have never gotten a definitive answer. Some say it was a cold or that Biden was just tired. Was it due to a cognitive decline heading to dementia? If the answer is yes, this means that Biden has no other choice than to withdraw. But as far as we know, Biden has not agreed to any testing. Unless he does, this provides a great deal of ammunition to those who are demanding his withdrawal.

For now, Biden has agreed to do more campaigning and interviews to demonstrate his functioning. He has done well so far, but will this convince his detractors? Can he continue to do his job for 4 more years? And even for those who believe he can, is he capable of winning the election to give him those 4 more years? Perhaps we will have a better idea of how this will sort out in the following weeks. So far, the great majority of his detractors have been unmoved.

But if Joe drops out, what are the alternatives? You can't replace something with nothing! Whether Joe stays or goes, there is an element of risk of a catastrophic loss to Trump in November.

There are the two main alternatives:

One is for Biden to resign his presidency and have VP Kamala Harris take over. She is sharp with a tongue to match to effectively combat Trump in a war of words over the rest of the election campaign. But justifiably or not, her approval numbers are even lower than Biden's which gives some people pause. In this candid profane video, Trump is already assuming that Biden is dropping out while licking his chops at the chance to take on Kamala. But Kamala shouldn't be so underestimated. She has served as Biden's spokesperson at enthusiastic rallies across the country on the vital issue of women's reproductive freedom. Please check out this Washington Post Jennifer Rubin op-ed assessing the pros and cons of a possible Harris presidential candidacy.

The other is for Biden to voluntarily release his committed convention delegates and have the nominee decided at the upcoming convention. This may lead to chaos with a grueling fight and a divided party. This is what happened when LBJ announced his withdrawal from the presidential nomination in 1968. Many feel that this divided party caused the eventual nominee, Hubert Humphrey to lose to Richard Nixon. The Democrats indeed have a deep bench of candidates, some of whom will be strong presidential candidates someday. But they are mostly unknowns on the national stage and have never been tested in the fiery crucible of an intense presidential campaign. Would they be an improvement over Biden running? Many believe so but who really knows?

Especially with the recent Supreme Court decision giving increased presidential immunity, there would be even fewer guardrails against Trump's totalitarian ambitions if he wins. This makes it even more urgent that Trump is defeated at all costs.

So here we are a little more than a week after the debate. Biden cannot be forced to withdraw because the convention delegates are committed to him. In addition, he has doubled down that he has no plans to withdraw from running. At the same time, a growing number of Democrats are calling for Biden to resign because he is too old to serve another term and fear that he will lose the election because of this.

So the Democrats are at this time gathered in a circular firing squad! I wonder if the people who are afraid of losing the election are part of a self-fulfilling prophecy? Their lack of support may indeed contribute to Biden's defeat in the end.

If Biden ultimately refuses to withdraw, there is another narrative these Democrats can adopt. "Although I cannot give my enthusiastic endorsement of Biden because of his age, he is a superior choice to a would-be destroyer of our democracy in Trump. So I am supporting Biden and appeal to you to also do the same."

Check out these latest (July 6, 2024) poll simulations from FiveThirtyEight.com:

Trump wins 51 times out of 100

in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden wins 49 times out of 100.

This means that while Trump got a small bump from Biden's poor debate performance, Trump didn't win that many more supporters with his torrent of lies at that debate. So despite all of the gloom and doom from Biden's detractors, it's still anybody's race to win!

I don't claim to know how this is all going to turn out. But circling back to the original question of whether Joe should stay or go, there are no easy answers!

Can Trump Really Win in 2024?

Spoiler Alert: It's very unlikely since he has so much working against him. But his odds are greater than zero which for many of us is terrifying.

Personal Disclosure: I like many others didn't think he would win in 2016. But many believe that Trump himself didn't even expect to win in 2016 either.

The days after the 2020 election turned to turmoil culminating in the January 6 insurrection in Congress which resulted in massive injuries and a few deaths. Trump believed overturning the largely ceremonial Senate count of the electoral vote decided in December was his last chance to overturn the election. Once that failed, he had no choice but to move out of the White House and contemplate another run in 2024.

As most of us know, if Trump had been convicted in the second impeachment conducted later that month, he would have been disqualified from seeking public office for life. And indeed 10 Senate Republicans voted for conviction but it was less than the 2/3 majority required for a conviction. This was a missed chance to get rid of a menace to our democracy once and for all! But it was not a secret vote so there were fears of retaliation held by many of the Republican Senators. And besides, few people thought he would seriously seek another term.

By most accounts, Trump did not really like the everyday duties of a president. He was known to spend many hours of the day watching TV and occasionally phoning in to his favorite Fox shows. Yes, it was a power trip but does it really beat playing golf every day at Mar-a-Lago and being worshiped by his fawning membership?

But there were storm clouds of upcoming indictments coming his way. Surely, the Department of Justice wouldn't prosecute a candidate running for office, he thought. So he declared his 2024 presidential candidacy far earlier than anyone else who would run for the Republican nomination. His announcement speech was lacking energy being read from a teleprompter. This would be the end of him in public office, or so we thought.

But one cannot underestimate his loving fan base who gave him more energy with each incendiary speech. Once the inevitable indictments landed, he even picked up more energy and poll numbers. His followers ate up pronouncements like "I am your retribution" and his campaign based on grievances was picking up steam. It didn't take long for him to lap the rest of the Republican primary field making him at this time, a prohibitive favorite to secure the party nomination in 2024.

In more recent months, he has talked of a totalitarian takeover of the Department of Justice, using it to prosecute those whom he believes wronged him along with enlisting a pre-screened army of loyalists to take over the rest of the government functions. In addition, many of his ambitions are supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation as Project 2025. He even floated the idea of pardons for convicted January 6 insurrectionists. And while he was at it, he believes he can use a presidential victory to shield himself from any justice should he win the 2024 election. Many observers feel this is his primary reason for running.

Trump as always is the showman who attracts media along with voter attention. On the other hand Biden has a much more subdued style that many have attributed to him being too old to run for office again. Biden may be too old, but little is said about the likely Republican nominee in Trump who is only 3 years younger.

Many in Biden's own party feel that he is too old to run again. But for better or worse, he did decide to run. His decision was helped along because parties make it difficult for a primary challenger to be competitive against an incumbent president. There have been a few in the past. LBJ was seriously challenged by Senators Eugene McCarthy and Robert F. Kennedy over the Vietnam War which led to LBJ's surprise withdrawal. And Senator Ted Kennedy had an unsuccessful run against President Jimmy Carter.

With the threat to our democracy Trump represents, perhaps Biden felt he is the only one who can defeat Trump. Many disagree, but what other candidate with enough experience would be a safe bet to beat Trump?

Something many overlook is that the Biden Administration is more than just one octogenarian. Unlike Trump who often filled positions with unqualified loyalists (e.g. Chief Advisors son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka), Biden has surrounded himself with many competent, experienced people to help him. In my opinion, if Biden somehow can't go the distance in his second term, that team of people, yes including VP Kamala Harris, will do a more than competent job of running things until the next election.

But what about all those polls that have Trump running close or even leading in some states? We should take this as a message to not take Trump lightly but we don't need to cower in fear. For one thing, polls a year before the election don't really tell us anything. Unlike political junkies like me, most people don't really pay attention to an upcoming election until about a month or two before. On top of that is a distinct possibility that Trump may be a convicted felon by Election Day. While many of his supporters don't mind the indictments, a convicted felon may give at least some a reason to rethink their support of him.

Democrats have been running the table lately over the issue of abortion. And it is a sure thing to be a prominent issue in 2024. While one's view of abortion is subjective, there is one objective fact: Pro-choice Americans are a solid majority, even in most heavily Republican states. When citizens have had a choice in state referendums over abortion, the pro-choice side so far has always won - even in deep Red states like Kansas and more recently, Ohio. 

When Roe v Wade was struck down, the pretense by Republicans was that now voters in individual states can decide on their own abortion laws. But that turned out to be a lie! Many of the Republican controlled states with some of the most onerous restrictions (no exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother) are controlled by heavily gerrymandered legislatures with lopsided Republican majorities that don't necessarily represent the will of its voters. Put another way, voters in many Republican controlled states are petitioning for referendums on abortion with those in charge doing everything to resist because they rightly fear that they would lose!

Strangely enough, many Republicans are doubling down against abortion saying it's a messaging issue. But this is nothing more than the denial of the pro-choice majority. Make no mistake about it, abortion is a losing issue for Republicans! But yes, some are starting to realize this. Recently, Texas Senators Cruz and Cornyn when asked about the Texas ban blocking a pregnant mother's request to abort an nonviable fetus refused to comment.

This quote from Cornyn was a real winner!

“I’m not a state official, so I’m not going to comment on what state officials are doing. I’m happy to comment on anything that I’m responsible for,”

Does he think the voters are that stupid? It was he along with all of the other Republican Senators who confirmed the three Trump Supreme Court nominees with the aim of overturning Roe.

But let's not get overconfident over Biden's chances over the abortion issue. There are a number of banana peels he can slip on.

The Israeli attack in Gaza to try and eliminate Hamas is fraught with political landmines. After the horrific October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas, Biden expressed his unconditional support of Israel. But as the civilian casualties in Gaza mounted, Israel has been condemned by many, especially on the left who despite Biden's efforts to exert some control over Israel, he is seen as an accomplice to what many consider to be the needless suffering and deaths of innocent Palestinian civilians in Israel's efforts to take out Hamas.

There is also talk of third party candidates running for the presidency. Retiring West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin is considering running as a No Labels candidate. More concerning is Jill Stein, running to the left again in the Green Party. Third party candidates can't win any states but can affect the outcome in closely contested swing states. Some believe Stein helped Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton in 2016. But it is indisputable that Ralph Nader in 2000 helped George W. Bush defeat Al Gore in Florida, delivering the presidency to Bush.

Although economic numbers are strong, the mood of much of the electorate is sour on the economy which is resulting in surprisingly low approval numbers for Biden which can hurt an incumbent president running for reelection.

So this is to say that obviously, Biden is not perfect. But despite the resistance to another Biden-Trump rematch, barring something unforeseen, the American electorate has a binary choice. Once the election gets closer, voters will get to choose between either the incumbent in Biden or Trump whose campaign language has degenerated from merely authoritarian to outright Hitler and Nazi propaganda.

But to preserve our democracy and not descend into authoritarianism, we must stay vigilant. As repulsive as Trump's hate speech may be to many of us, the sad truth is that Trump's enthusiastic supporters love him not in spite of his hateful words but because of them. Our only saving grace is that they are slightly in the minority. So for those of us on the other side, when Election Day comes, we will have to show up and vote to save our democracy. Staying home is not an option!

Biden modestly sums it all up this way with a quote from his father:

..don't compare me with the Almighty. Compare me to the alternative.

Liberals Aren't Perfect Either

For those of us on the liberal side of politics, watching the conservatives (especially the Trumpers) self-destruct is not only surreal but it's scary as hell. Watching The Former Guy, now twice indicted, promise to appoint his own personal Attorney General to prosecute all of his enemies in what he calls the deep state (presumably Democrats along with Republicans who have turned on him) would leave our democracy in shambles. In addition, he would pardon the January 6 insurrectionists sent to prison. Even worse, a number of other Republican primary challengers have also expressed their approval for pardoning the January 6 prisoners and perhaps Trump himself if one of them wins and he is convicted before the 2024 election.

But while this group is going batshit crazy, NYT liberal columnist Nicholas Kristof in a recent column, It's Easy to Feel Righteous in the Trump Era. Liberals, Beware. warned his fellow liberals not to act too smug. We have faults too that we need to address and hopefully strive for improvement. I urge the reader to check out this linked article.

At the end of the article is an embedded video surprisingly produced by the NYT which is also on YouTube, Blue States,You're the Problem. The video picks out parts of the 2020 Democratic Party Platform and argues that the states exclusively controlled by the Democratic Party have been doing a poor job of upholding the principles outlined there. As a liberal, I grudgingly admit that the arguments presented have merit and that the Democrats certainly have room for improvement.

Having said that, I have to push back in a couple of areas. It's convenient that the Democrats have presented a document that can be exposed to criticism. So can we do the same for the Republicans? Unfortunately not because the party agreed that instead of creating a 2020 Republican Platform, they just agreed to say that whatever Donald Trump wanted would be their platform and called it a day. Whatever failings the Blue States may have, none are as egregious as most (but not all) of the Red States refusing to accept the Medicaid Expansion part of Obamacare needlessly leaving many thousands of their residents without health insurance.

I find that often the most interesting parts of op-ed articles are the reader comments. One in particular, eloquently summed things up by saying that although we need to examine and try to fix our own faults, we can't be caught navel-gazing when there is an oncoming freight train bearing down on us.

I will close with his words:

Bob Bruce Anderson

MA June 17

This article holds many truths. We should certainly examine the areas where we fail. There are many. Hubris doesn't help.

But let's not take our eyes off the hill in front of us. There are enemies of democracy and freedom charging right at us. They have guns that slaughter civilians - children. They love guns. They want a national religion with its own set of rules. They don't want young people or people of color to vote. They believe their elected officials are above the law. They admire dictators. They are attempting to dismantle the Federal government. They don't believe in protecting the environment. They don't believe in science. They don't believe there is a serious Climate Crisis and if a few do, they don't think we created it.

You are absolutely correct that "Liberals" have failed in many ways. I'd start with the fact that our guys still take big money from the Oligarchs. It ain't a perfect world. But if we don't fight with all our might, our failings will be silly little mistakes relative to the fascist world we are marching towards. A world where someone else's religion reigns supreme. Where women are not full citizens. Where people of color are marginalized even more than now. Where rich people will pay even less in taxes and poverty will explode.

And the homelessness you describe will multiply exponentially. Mr. Kirstof [sic], I respect your attempt at asking us to find our humility.

But now, back to the battle for freedom, democracy and to save a planet.

Remembering Franco and Roberto

December 23, 2022 marks the 50th anniversary of a joyous moment for Pittsburgh sports fans when the Steelers defeated the Oakland Raiders by a miracle deflection pass caught by Franco Harris near the very end of the game when all hope was lost for the home team.

But despite the game's importance, other than the lucky fans able to witness the game at Three Rivers Stadium, the rest of the city of Pittsburgh was not able to watch the game live because of a stupid NFL home game TV blackout rule (lifted the following year). Instead, we had to gather in front of our radios and use our imaginations to fill in what we couldn't see, including that play later named the Immaculate Reception. Here is Jack Fleming's unforgettable radio play-by-play along with a video of what he saw.

Unfortunately, this 50th anniversary celebration has been turned into a time of sadness with the sudden, unexpected death of Franco Harris.

Also 50 years ago on December 23, 1972 there was a catastrophic earthquake that killed many thousands in Nicaragua. As fate would have it, that event tragically affected Pittsburgh, but not until about a week later.

Although relief supplies came in to Nicaragua from around the world, they weren't efficiently reaching the right people because of corruption and probably just plain incompetence. Pittsburgh Pirate superstar Roberto Clemente went to San Juan to gather relief supplies and fly them to the affected people. But it wasn't enough for Roberto to just send some supplies there and call it a day. He had to be there in Nicaragua to make sure the supplies reached the right people so he boarded the plane along with the overload of cargo stuffed onto it. The plane crashed shortly after takeoff killing all of its occupants. Clemente's body was never found.

It was New Year's Day morning we got the tragic news that we lost Roberto.

In addition to being a legendary and beloved athlete, especially to his native Puerto Rico and all of Latin America, he died a hero's death in the middle of a humanitarian mission. I can't begin to describe his athleticism with the Latino flair of a matador. There was never a player like him. 

In many ways, his brilliant career was bittersweet with him enduring a never ending battle against prejudice for him being not just a black but also a Latino. The reader is invited to watch this ESPN Sports Century Documentary about his life and career.

RIP Franco and Roberto!

America Saved Its Democracy!

OK, I admit it. I was scared of America losing its democracy. Really scared!

It started about a year ago when states with Republican legislatures passed a countless number of voter suppression laws aimed at making voting more difficult for minorities (who normally vote Democratic). All this was under the pretense of fighting election fraud which has never been proven to exist at levels that would affect any of the elections. As a reminder, it was Trump's own lackey Attorney General, Bill Barr who said that there was no significant amount of fraud in any of the states that would have affected the 2020 presidential election.

Then there was the extreme gerrymandering in many of the Republican state legislatures (Democrats are guilty of this too but to a lesser degree). For example, Wisconsin had a 61 to 38 Republican majority in the State Assembly and a 21 to 12 majority in the State Senate. All of this with the number of Wisconsin Democrat and Republican voters split down the middle!

But Wisconsin voters selected a Democrat in Tony Evers with veto power to keep some control over the legislature. But all too many Republicans want to rule without any restraint or accountability. So their desire was to increase their advantage to a supermajority which would make the governor powerless to veto anything the Republicans wanted to do, no matter how crazy it was.

Even worse, the Wisconsin Republican candidate for governor along with his secretary of state candidate (who validates the state's elections) promised that if he were elected, Republicans would never lose another election! This is no less than a totalitarian power grab!

Even more scary is that the candidate Republican combinations of governors and secretaries of state were planning to do this same totalitarian power grab in a number of other swing states - Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada. This means that if Donald Trump or any other Republican runs for president and loses in 2024, these people would have the power to flip the results. No more free elections means no more democracy! These were candidates who were endorsed by Trump in exchange for them spreading the Big Lie that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.

The American voters had so many other concerns on their minds like the rising costs of gas and food. In addition, if these Republican governors were to prevail, more abortion rights may well have been taken away with the permission of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade.

These were undoubtedly serious concerns. But President Biden along with Democratic strategists correctly realized that if we lost our democracy, we would no longer have any control over who is leading us. So he loudly proclaimed in urgently delivered addresses that Democracy Is On The Ballot! His many critics accused him of crying wolf. But that figurative wolf waiting to destroy our democracy was real!!!

But would enough people listen? Americans have mostly had a detached attitude towards elections and politics in general. Our turnout rates for elections have been among the lowest in the world. Sure, the political junkies like me understand the situation but would the average voter get the urgent message that our democracy may be effectively hijacked if enough election deniers won? The thought of America losing its democracy made me depressed and sick at the stomach. 

Although some liberals like Michael Moore said we would be just fine, I watched Real Time with Bill Maher the Friday before the election. He normally ends each show with a funny bit as part of what he calls New Rules. But this time, Maher was dead serious and feeling fatalistic about the fate of our democracy after the upcoming election. For those who didn't quite understand the gravity of it all, he eloquently summed it up in this video titled Democracy's Deathbed that I urge the reader to watch. I was convinced that it was all hopeless.

I tried to occupy my mind on that Election Day and even had dinner with a group of friends before going home to tune in to the expected bad news. But to my shock and many others, the news was unexpectedly bright. The election denying candidates for governors and secretaries of state who ran to hijack the swing states to make them captive to Republican partisan election officials all got defeated...one after another after another. And the attempt for the above mentioned supermajority in Wisconsin was also defeated. Enough American voters cared after all - even the younger voters who have been notoriously fickle about turning out to vote!

There were Republican victories by election deniers in stronghold states like Ohio, Florida and Texas. But those are less of a worry because they would likely win those states anyway without resorting to any underhanded tactics.

I am convinced that saving our democracy was a crucial reason the so-called Red Wave expected to crush the Democrats never happened. But the outrage over the loss of abortion rights by the Supreme Court along with the plainly batshit crazy candidates that were nominated with the help of Donald Trump certainly contributed.

Although many Republicans are mad as hell at Trump for causing them to lose so many election races, it is unclear whether the party will continue to move on without him. But Trump isn't going anywhere and has now announced his candidacy for president in 2024, all while the threat of multiple criminal indictments of him are in the air. Will running for president again protect him from being indicted? He likely thinks so but most legal observers say no. We shall see...

There are more crazy times to come but we (and the rest of the free world) can at least breathe easier having saved our precious democracy...at least for now!

Poland's Abortion Ban Nightmare

Even though I have long been a liberal on the pro-choice side, I have been reluctant to weigh in on this issue until recently. Part of being pro-choice is acknowledging that some people believe that abortion is immoral while others believe it is a necessary evil to preserve the right of a woman to control her own body. Both sides have a right to their belief and to live their lives as they see fit. But when one side wants to legally impose their will on the other, this can lead to problems - some very serious!

Earlier this month, the New York Times had a story Poland Shows the Risks for Women When Abortion Is Banned that I believe most people would find to be disturbing whichever side of this issue they are on. 

The banning of abortion in many US states will become a reality if the US Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade as expected. It is understandable that some people who find abortion to be immoral want to make it go away by making it illegal. But as we know from countless past examples (most notably Prohibition and the War on Drugs) making something illegal doesn't make it go away! This is especially true with abortion since even with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, many states will continue to make it legally available. So especially for women who have the financial means, they can easily travel to a neighboring state if needed to legally have the procedure done. Only the poor will be put into a bind and perhaps forced to have a pregnancy they don't want or can't afford - or even have their lives put at risk in the event of complications.

I hope all of you will read the complete article in the above link. For now, I wish to quote and comment on some of the passages in this article on what are some serious unintended consequences of the present abortion ban in Poland.

Let's start with the article's subheading:

Poland’s abortion ban has had many unintended consequences. One is that doctors are sometimes afraid to remove fetuses or administer cancer treatment to save women’s lives.

This is a tragic reminder that women in Poland have needlessly died - especially when the laws favor the unborn over the life of the mother.

The long battle over Poland’s 29-year-old ban on abortion has intensified over the past 17 months after the elimination of the last significant exception permitting the procedure: fetal abnormalities.

The most common pro-life position through the years in the US is to allow exceptions to any possible abortion ban when rape, incest or the life of the mother are to be considered. But Poland's ban most notably does not allow for exceptions. In the US where one conservative wants to prove they are more conservative than others, a frightening number of proposed laws along with conservative candidates are proudly in favor of the incredibly cruel 'no exceptions' form of abortion bans.

Only one in 10 Poles support the stricter ban, which was enabled by a decision by the country’s highest court, dominated by judges loyal to a deeply conservative government. 

Just like in the US, the majority of Poles are pro-choice. But each country has their own version of a Supreme Court where religious conservatives can impose their will on its people. In the US, the Evangelical Christians are the main political driver. In Poland, it is the Catholic Church.

Just this month, the government required Poland’s central health care system to log pregnancies. Opponents called it a “pregnancy register” that could be used to track down illegal terminations.

Now, we really have a slippery slope! About 1 out of 4 pregnancies end in a miscarriage. Common sense says we can't prosecute a woman for an accidental miscarriage. But how does a government determine for sure if the miscarriage is accidental or from an abortion? This would involve incredible violations of privacy that at least in the US would be intolerable, especially when some of the same people consider Covid mask mandates to be an intolerable invasion of privacy!

Admittedly, there are few examples. But there are some women who have served time in prison for what was likely an accidental miscarriage. But this can be taken a step even further. A woman who suffers an accidental miscarriage can still be prosecuted if it is determined that they contributed to the miscarriage by lifestyle choices such as smoking or drugs. And yes, it has happened here! 

Since [Poland's] last year’s ban on abortions of fetuses with abnormalities, the demand for late-term abortions has surged, too.

A popular straw man argument by some on the pro-life side is that the pro-choice side wants abortion on demand until the day before the baby is born. Don't believe me? There was this gem from Donald Trump repeated often during his 2020 campaign rallies. 

"Virtually every Democrat candidate has declared their unlimited support for extreme late-term abortion, ripping babies straight from the mother’s womb, right up until the very moment of birth."

Demagoguery at its finest! But as the fact check article clarifies:

Most abortions are performed in the earlier stages of pregnancy. About 1 percent happen after the fetus reaches the point of viability. [Normally as a result of a serious fetal abnormality.] In short, the president is describing something that rarely happens and that no Democrat is calling for anyway.

It's easy for some to advocate abortion bans. But as the example of Poland shows, the unintended consequences can be tragic and the invasion of privacy these bans entail would make them almost unenforceable. And after all of these draconian measures, abortion rates are hardly affected - which was presumably the purpose of the bans in the first place.

Abortion has been constitutionally protected in the US for almost 50 years. So most of us, especially those of child-bearing age have never lived in a US where abortion has been banned. So the question must be asked, When it comes to abortion rights, do we want to become Poland?