Happy Sequester Day! For those living in a cave, the sequester here in the US is a large indiscriminate slashing of government spending designed to be a poison pill that was so
terrible that both Democrats (wanting to prevent large non-military cuts) and
Republicans (wanting to prevent large military cuts) would be motivated to come to an
agreement on revenues and spending.
But as it turned out, this was all a miscalculation. While Republicans have been traditionally in
favor of spending cuts, they have normally treated military spending as a
sacred cow, never to be touched. But
increasingly, there are more Republicans in Congress who are so anti-spending
that they don’t care anymore about even cutting military spending.
So the result was largely Republican indifference about
negotiating a deal before the March 1 deadline, and some were even cheering
Speaker Boehner for allowing the sequester to happen by refusing to deal
with President Obama.
What is behind this
impasse? In short, it is about the power
of corporate America over our government.
In the recent debt ceiling agreement at the beginning of the year, the
president got the Republicans to finally agree to let the Bush tax cuts expire
for those making over $400,000 a year.
But while that is a good start, the government is losing vast amounts of
revenue from what can only be described as corporate welfare – subsidies to
hugely profitable industries like oil and big agriculture along with tax
loopholes that allow very profitable companies to pay little or no income tax.
The president wants to address the corporate part of the
revenue equation in this round while the Republicans desperately want to keep
the corporate subsidies and loopholes intact, arguing that the expiration of the Bush
tax cuts counts as a tax hike and that no others will be considered.
So how do large multinational corporations manage to make
profits that can be in the billions while often completely avoiding paying any
taxes? One major way is for these
multinationals to establish subsidiaries in havens for low taxes such as the
Cayman Islands. Through an abusive
practice called transfer
mispricing, corporations can manipulate where they report most of their
profits for tax purposes. So to take
advantage, an artificially high percentage of profits are reported as being
made in the tax haven countries while a low percentage is reported for US tax
purposes – and thus little or no taxes on those profits. The interested reader can check out the
documentary We're Not Broke available
on hulu, Netflix, or for free in this
link which offers an excellent background on these practices that the
average viewer can understand. And Democrats, including the president are not spared from criticism.
Ah, but there’s only one problem from the corporations’
standpoint. While they have their cake,
they can’t quite eat it – yet. Profits reported as being made in a foreign
country cannot be brought into the US until their US tax obligation is
satisfied. It has been estimated
that as much as a trillion dollars is
being stockpiled overseas which does nothing to address our deficits or in
general, help our economy. So what to
do? Simple. Congress just asks for a
corporate tax
holiday to allow this money to come home either tax free or at greatly
reduced tax rates under the guise of this money being able to help the
economy. But we’ve been there and done that!
Goaded by battalions of corporate lobbyists, members of Congress are working to give a select group of U.S. multinational firms like Apple, Oracle and Pfizer a lavish tax break on a trillion dollars stashed offshore.
The avowed goal is to generate jobs and investment, but the offshore tax holiday was tried before, in 2004, and the lion’s share of the benefits went not to unemployed workers and their families, but to corporate shareholders and executives.
There is a lot of brainwashing of America by and on behalf of
corporate America. There is the cry that
“America is Broke” so we are told that to fix the economy, we are forced to cut
government spending (also known as austerity) while ignoring the significant
amount of additional tax revenue available from just making corporations pay
their fair share of taxes. How much is a
‘fair share’ is subject to debate, but
certainly at or near zero is clearly unfair.
And then there is the
ultimate big lie “We don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.”
which ignores that much of our present deficit is due to the Bush tax cut
giveaways to the wealthy with the result that individual tax rates in the US have
been at or near historic lows. And while
the US statutory corporate tax rate
of 35% is among the highest in the world, the largest corporations pay an effective tax rate (after deductions and
loopholes) that is among the lowest in the world.
So how much will the sequester hurt America? Some say a lot, others say not so much. But there is now at least some agreement on
both sides of the aisle that cutting
government spending will result in the loss of jobs rather than the gain of
jobs. So why would corporate America
favor a policy of austerity when the result has been demonstrated in Europe to
be a disaster for those who have tried it?
Are these people just ignorant of basic economic principles? Or do they have an agenda that benefits their
self-interest at the expense of others.
After reading the following comment to an op-ed on European austerity by
NYT reader Jeff
Anderson-Lee, I
just wished that I had written this.
If austerity appears to be the correct answer to some, then what is their goal? Certainly not the recovery of the general economy. The time is long passed to give them a pass on simply being ill-informed, but rather ill-intentioned. Even many Republican governors are now expressing fear over the potential negative economic effects of the forthcoming "sequestration" in the USA. So they are not unaware.
Which means they must be desiring the outcomes: A poor economy provides cover for asking for tax-cuts for "job-creators", for increased "corporate-welfare", for cuts to social programs, for more "right-to-work" laws, for practically free overnight funds from the Fed to the banks, for opportunities to "privatize" government services in the name of "efficiency", and so on. Productivity is up as salaried workers put in unpaid overtime out of fear for their jobs. Wage demands are lowered and wage increases forgone because of "tough economic times" and high-unemployment, yet somehow many large corporations are having record profits (and record executive compensation).
No. The heads of Europe are not calling for austerity out of ignorance, but rather malice.
So we have a situation where because of the wealthy and
large corporate interests being able to avoid taxes so skillfully, those at the
middle and bottom of the economic food chain have to pay the price by way of
cuts in their safety net along with other vital functions such as education,
police and fire fighting. In effect, the
middle and lower classes are subsidizing the rich.
To add insult to injury, because of this depressed economy,
many companies while making handsome profits that benefit those at the top, are
taking advantage of downward pressure on wages so that many of the working poor
have to resort to government assistance to have enough money to live on and/or
secure some form of health insurance.
This is not only unfair because this is another subsidy for
corporations, but when more people are put out of work (no longer paying taxes)
and need more help from government safety net programs, the deficit usually increases.
There is the argument that corporations are the ‘makers’ and
that those at middle and bottom who need help to stay afloat in this miserable
economy are the ‘takers’ or for the Ayn Rand devotees like Paul Ryan are ‘moochers’. They argue that corporations exist to make as
much profit as possible while paying as little in tax as possible. So
what’s the harm in that? This
overlooks that those who gain their wealth do so because they benefit from a
country that has allowed them the opportunity to get to where they are. They benefit from publicly funded education
to give them workers along with the infrastructure and other vital taxpayer
funded services too numerous to mention that many of us take for granted.
Taxes are the dues we must pay to keep our government and
our society running properly. When
corporations and the wealthiest among us don’t pay their fair share of taxes
while calling others who must sacrifice because of their greed, moochers, they need to look in the mirror to find the
real moochers!
No comments:
Post a Comment